LYWA Monthly e-letter Archive
No. 42: September 2006 |
|
Dear Archive Friends,
Thank you so much for your kind interest in and support of
our work. Please share this e-letter with any and all! And
remember, if you have any difficulties forwarding this email,
or if you want to see any of our past issues, you can find
them in our e-letter archive.
Our
Latest!
The books I mentioned in the last couple of e-letters, Lama
Yeshe’s The Peaceful
Stillness of the Silent Mind (reprint) and Ego,
Attachment and Liberation (new), are being printed; Ego,
Attachment and Liberation will be sent out next month
to all members and benefactors. (By the way, you're a "benefactor"
if you've made a donation of $20 or more in the last year;
see our Donations page
for more information.) You can also visit our
Membership page for more information about that special
program.
If you are neither a member nor a benefactor but would like
our new book, you'll be able to order it on-line in a week
or so. In the meantime, you can order
any of our current titles—and become a member or
benefactor in time to receive the new book automatically.
Audio and Video
For those of you haven’t seen our Lama
Yeshe DVDs, we’ve posted Part 1 of Lama Yeshe’s
Introduction to Tantra on
Google video. Check it out!
This month's podcast is another excerpt from Lama Zopa Rinpoche's
teachings in Barcelona, Spain in September of 2005. You can
listen online through our Online
Recordings page. This teaching begins with a hilarious
story told by Rinpoche about "tibetan rice"; listen
in and you'll understand what I mean.
The Buddha and Vegetarianism
I recently read an excellent and inspiring book, Food
of Bodhisattvas, which was written by the great Shabkar
Tsokdrug Rangdrol, where he makes a wonderful case for not
eating sentient beings (better known as meat) based upon many
quotations of Guru Shakyamuni Buddha as found in several sutras.
I was surprised not to have known before that the Buddha had
spoken out so strongly in favor of vegetarianism. If you have
any doubts about this, please read the book.
Advice from Rinpoche
Some people have asked what practices can be done to help
pacify the violence in the world today and to help elect wise
and compassionate leaders. Lama Zopa Rinpoche says that regular
group or individual recitation of the Sutra
of Golden Light can accomplish both goals. Please
let us know if you decide to do this and what your experiences
are of doing so.
And speaking of advice from Rinpoche, the Online Advice
Book continues to grow. This month we've added a number
of advices to the Transitions
section, including advice for practices
at the moment of death. We have also made a number of
additions to the Retreat
Advice page in the Practice
Advice section. We now have over 380 advices posted.
New
Additions to our Web site
We have just added a series of drawings by Lama Zopa
Rinpoche to our Photo
Gallery, much like the one you see here. We hope that
you've been pleased with the new format of the Photo Gallery.
Please let us know what you think, and also let us know if
you have any photos you'd like to submit to the Archive.
Our newest addition to the Members'
Area is the series of teachings from the 12th Kopan Course
in December 1979, which includes extensive lectures from Rinpoche,
and a lecture from Lama Yeshe.
I would like to thank our fantastically wonderful technical
computer staff, Jennifer Barlow and Sonal Shastri for the
great stuff LYWA brings you on our Web site: Teachings, Lama
Zopa Rinpoche's Advice Book, the photo gallery, audio teachings,
the members' area...pretty much everything! Thank you Jen
and Sonal.
Seminars Near and Far
I’ve been asked to lead a seminar on impermanence and
death in Cincinnati, Ohio during the weeked of October 13–15.
It's titled Life,
Death, & After Death: A Buddhist Approach.
To celebrate the wonderful activities of what Lama Yeshe
used to call Universal Education and is now called Essential
Education: Universal Compassion & Wisdom for Peace, which
is hosting some meetings in the USA this month and next, we
offer below a talk Lama Yeshe gave at an Australian teachers’
college in 1975.
Thank you again so much for your kind interest and support.
Much love,
Nick Ribush
Director
On Educating Children
On Lama Yeshe’s 1975 visit to Australia,
one of his students, a trainee teacher, invited Lama to his
college to talk to some of the other student teachers.
The
purpose of education is to benefit people. We all know this.
However, different countries have their own ideas of what
constitutes benefit according to their individual inclinations.
What some countries consider to be bad education other countries
consider good. In other words, what makes education good or
bad depends on how one interprets good and bad.
These days, people live in so many different environments,
societies and communities—rural, urban, industrial,
intellectual and so forth—that education itself has
become confused. For a start, no one person can learn every
existent technology; that’s obviously impossible.
Therefore, the decision as to what constitutes a good education
depends very much upon personal interest, but ultimately we
have to decide whether what we’re learning benefits
us and helps us benefit others. If we’re not clear about
this from the beginning we can embark on one course of study
but finish up thinking, “Oh, this doesn’t help,”
and drop it, then try something else but that doesn’t
work either; then something else again…we go on so many
educational trips but eventually finish up empty.
I think everybody—especially people in the West—should
at least receive a basic, general education in such things
as writing, mathematics, cooking, gardening and housekeeping.
Those things are essential. If we simply focus on theory and
technical education and ignore the practicalities we won’t
even be able to make ourselves breakfast. That’s not
realistic.
Life in the modern world demands we know the fundamentals—how
to prepare food and how things work. The benefit is security.
What use is abstruse technology if we suddenly find ourselves
alone? We could die of hunger. Don’t think it couldn’t
happen; in this world we can never be sure. And don’t
think it’s easy to survive because we have money. Money
isn’t everything.
Therefore, an education in the basics of human necessity
is essential. Studying technology without knowing the fundamentals
of survival can be very dangerous.
When it comes to teaching others, we have to take into account
and foster our students’ abilities and interests and
try to develop those qualities in the classroom; if we don’t,
the students just get bored or upset. Especially at this time,
it’s not wise to teach in an authoritarian, dogmatic
way—“Sit there! Learn this!” Children nowadays
are very intellectually free and don’t respond well
to force. So we have to arouse their interest. Skillful teachers
know how to make their students interested in the subject
being taught, whatever it is; that’s a uniquely human
ability. Simply pushing students isn’t just unwise;
it doesn’t work.
In Tibet, we taught students language, philosophy, science
and so forth from the beginning but we always made sure the
students were interested first. We never pushed. As a result,
they’d feel that education was their responsibility,
not something that only the teacher wanted, and thus they
learned easily. You can’t teach students through force.
Being a teacher is a big responsibility. But learning alone
doesn’t make a teacher; we have to know how to interest
our students in what we want them to learn. If we don’t,
it’s impossible to teach. A good teacher should know
each student’s individual character and temperament
and how to work with that. If the teacher’s attitude
is “My way is the only way” and the student’s
is different, it becomes a problem.
Another quality that a good teacher should have is equanimity.
Good teachers don’t favor those students who make them
happy and forget about or reject those who are slow, temperamental
or difficult to communicate with. That’s not right.
If the teacher gives off a good vibration, has a good relationship
with all of his or her students, makes them interested in
the subject and benefits their life, that’s wonderful.
However, there are unskillful teachers who put students down
and focus on their bad side: “He is this and that; she
didn’t learn anything; his character is bad” and
so forth. If you put people down, they’ll feel insecure,
but it’s natural for people to have shortcomings—we
all do; it’s not just this one child. Don’t think
that some people are unaffected by criticism; it’s not
true.
Also, we all have different aptitudes. We learn some things
quickly and others slowly; we understand some things the instant
we hear them but find others incredibly difficult to grasp
and to integrate with our own experience. Therefore we have
to expect that because everybody’s mind is different,
some students will find certain subjects difficult and others
easy. But, given time, most students can learn most things
and we shouldn’t give up on or denigrate those who don’t
get something the first or second time.
So teachers should have the skill to treat students as individuals
and not generalize that they’re all the same. No two
personalities are identical; each person’s ability to
learn is different. Also, some people have a tendency to judge
others on superficialities without knowing what they’re
like inside, but others’ inner abilities can be very
difficult to comprehend; most of the time we don’t even
know our own abilities.
Check your own educational experiences. You probably found
some subjects unbelievably easy to understand while others
were still incomprehensible even after repeated study. Why
was that? Your own experience should help you have patience
when you teach.
Sometimes educational systems are fixed but standardized
systems don’t always work, so be careful when deciding
which approach is best for your students. Methods and curricula
have to change with the times.
It’s also important to encourage your students and
make them feel that they’re capable of success. When
you do so, they make progress and see their own development
for themselves. That’s very important. If, instead,
you always emphasize your own ability and learning and tell
students, “This is the way I teach and this is the way
you learn,” you disempower them, which is clearly the
wrong thing to do. It’s just your own power trip.
With education, students gain their own power, and with that
you can teach them more. It’s hard to teach people who
are completely dull and foolish. Therefore, try to show your
students how great their own abilities are. When they understand
that, they’re so happy and continuously progress. If
you put them down—“You’re stupid, hopeless”—they
just get nervous and insecure and feel that they can never
learn, and further education becomes impossible. When people
believe it’s impossible for them to learn it becomes
impossible for them to learn.
Confident students are the ones who make the best progress.
When students think, “Yes, I can do this,” they
advance. Even when set complicated tasks they feel that in
time they can gradually accomplish them.
And if students have special needs and can’t be taught
intellectually, you can teach them non-verbally through art
or physical movement. Their IQ might be low but their sense
perception allows them to easily understand what they see.
It’s especially important to explain to children why
they should get an education; as I mentioned before, you can’t
force them to learn. If they understand the reasons they’ll
take more of an interest in their studies and be much easier
to teach. They don’t necessarily have to understand
all the logic for and benefits of learning, just some. Anyway,
if you simply tell them they have to study “because
it’s the law” or “because I want you to,”
they’ll just ask “Why?”
That’s true. Kids today aren’t easy. They always
want to know why. It’s not like it used to be in the
old days. Think of the traditional English methods of education.
Children had no choice; they had to do as they were told.
Teachers didn’t have to explain anything; they had all
the power and used it. But that was in the past. These days
children are more intelligent and skeptical and teachers seem
to have lost the power they used to have—it’s
has moved a little more to the students’ side. Perhaps
they’ve unionized! Anyway, the conclusion is to give
students logical reasons for why they should get educated.
It’s not easy to be a teacher. Good teachers take responsibility
for their students’ lives. Perhaps this doesn’t
happen so much in the West but that’s how it was in
Tibet. Our teachers felt very responsible for they way their
students thought and behaved and in general tried to ensure
that their lives were constructive and uncomplicated. But
even though Western teachers today have less influence over
students than they used to, they still have some.
Therefore, as much as you can, give off good vibrations and
come from a place of sound philosophy rather than misconception.
Many teachers’ ideas are total misconceptions and when
this is reflected in their unconscious behavior it adversely
affects their students: they adopt their teachers’ erroneous
ideas and copy their bad behavior. I’m not just being
negative; it happens. So be careful how you think and act.
A teachers’ influence extends well beyond what you
teach; your character is also very important. I don’t
mean that you should just be superficially diplomatic; I mean
that you should feel deeply responsible to communicate well
with your students and really understand them.
It can be quite difficult to choose the kind of life you
want to lead. Before deciding upon the subjects that you want
to study you have to look ahead and choose a career that will
give you the money you’ll need to live the way you want.
For many people this means a life of luxury, so you have to
see what kind of education will lead to that. That’s
not always easy.
For example, I’ve seen many people choose their education,
get their degree, be successful but still finish up unhappy
with their job. Therefore, if you’re going to be a teacher,
you need to be very wise and skillful in your approach so
that the education you give others is beneficial for them
and yourself as well. And as I said before, the way to give
the best education to others is to approach them as individuals
and make them interested in what you teach. You can’t
teach everybody the same subject. There’s no one best
thing.
I know that in some places the syllabus is fixed and that’s
what you’re expected to teach rather than something
that accords to your students’ interests. But if you’re
wise you can still loosen it up rather than teach it in a
concrete way; you can spice up the set topics with things
that your students will find interesting. That’s possible.
The bottom line is that if your students are happy with what
you teach, they’ll learn.
And now, if there are any questions I’d be happy to
try to answer them.
Q: Lama, here we’re training to teach children
aged five to thirteen. At the beginning you suggested teaching
the basic necessities for life; could you tell us briefly
what those basic necessities are?
Lama: What I meant was that you should have the
sincere wish to help your students and when you teach you
should do so peacefully, not aggressively. That will rub off
on your students and they’ll remember you for the rest
of their lives as somebody who taught beautifully, with patience.
Furthermore, your kindness will be reflected in the way they
act; they will pass the warm feeling they got from you onto
others. Children always copy their teachers so you have to
impress them the right way.
Of course, you can explain the purpose of the actual education
but you can also tell your students that that’s not
all there is; that there’s something else. You can tell
them that they should have warm feelings for and dedicate
their lives to others; that selfishness brings only unhappiness.
You can definitely explain that kind of thing.
The human mind is really beautiful. If you act positively
your students will automatically absorb that. They may not
have the conscious thought “He’s good,”
but that’s the effect you’ll have on their subconscious.
So you don’t have to say, “Studying math is the
only way to be happy.” That’s completely silly;
they’ll laugh at you. Instead, you can say something
like, “Math isn’t that important but you might
need to know some when you go shopping.” Explain the
need in a simple way; then they won’t be confused. Explain
things in a very down-to-earth way. Some teachers exaggerate
the importance of what they’re teaching and that just
confuses their students’ minds. Of course, sometimes
teachers themselves are confused and pass their confusion
on to their students. Then the students go home and confuse
their parents, their parents confuse the rest of the community
and confusion is generated all round.
Q: Lama, does the practice of meditation give you
the peace and stability to remain calm in spite of confusion?
Lama: Yes, it does. Meditation shows you what’s
happening within your mind. It shows how your past experiences
influence the present and how your present experiences will
affect you in the future.
Q: Who controlled children’s education in
Tibet? Here, the government’s in charge.
Lama: We had different kinds of school. Some children
went to medical college; others were trained in monasteries.
In general, most Tibetan children were educated in the monastery.
Q: Western children watch much TV and have many
more distractions than Tibetan children, but can we still
start teaching them meditation at such early ages as five
or six?
Lama: It depends. If a child has a violent, uncontrolled
mind and finds it impossible to keep still in class, even
at the age of ten or twelve, perhaps you can teach him to
relax his body, his physical nervous system, with some kind
of simple meditation technique. It can be very natural. You
don’t have to believe something to meditate; it’s
more to do with mind and feeling. You can simply teach children
to concentrate on some part of their body: their stomach,
heart or head, for example. And you can make it a game; just
let them see what they experience for an hour or so. You don’t
have to push them: “Meditate!” You can also teach
such children to recite mantras. That can also help a lot.
But for students who don’t have that kind of problem
and are studying well, you don’t need to teach meditation
or mantra. It’s only for those who are complicated and
with whom it’s hard to communicate.
Q: I’ve tried teaching children mantras but
once they master it they seem to get bored very quickly, like
in five or ten minutes.
Lama: Yes, that can happen, but don’t make
them do it all the time, just occasionally, and never for
a long period. If children concentrate strongly for even a
short time it can be very powerful because they don’t
intellectualize as much as we do.
Well, I think that’s all. Thank you; thank you very
much.
Lama Yeshe gave this talk at Kedron Park Teachers College,
Queensland, on April 29, 1975. Edited from the Lama Yeshe
Wisdom Archive by Nicholas Ribush.
For advice from Lama Zopa Rinpoche on educating children,
visit the School-Age
Children section of the online Advice Book.
| If you know of others who might like to receive
this monthly LYWA e-letter, please ask them to contact
info@LamaYeshe.com
or subscribe by visiting www.lamayeshe.com.
See past issues, change your e-letter type, or unsubscribe
here.
Lama Yeshe Wisdom Archive
PO Box 356
Weston, MA 02493 · USA
Telephone: (781) 259-4466
info@lamayeshe.com · www.lamayeshe.com
Affiliated with the FPMT |
|